Uptake and Discontinuation of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Uninsured Transgender and Cisgender Women: A Public-Private Partnership Model in North Carolina.

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains underutilized among cis and trans women. The PrEP Initiative Program (PIP) is a novel public-private partnership implemented at 12 local clinics in North Carolina. PIP provides HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and clinical and laboratory monitoring for PrEP to uninsured/underinsured clients. We sought to understand service-related differences among both cis and trans women enrolled in PIP, including STIs diagnoses, clinic type, sources of referral, services needed, and reasons for PrEP discontinuation. The Kaplan-Meier curves display retention on PrEP over the duration of the program. Since 2018, 142 women (cis n = 113; trans n = 29) enrolled, and 136 started PrEP. The majority were ages 25-34 years (31.7%) or 18-24 years (29.6%), Black (57.8%) or Latinx (24.7%). Approximately 20.6% of recipients reported at least one STI while enrolled. Overall, trans women requested fewer services than cis women. After accounting for the amount of time each patient was taking PrEP, there were higher rates of trans women diagnosed with syphilis than cis women. Rates of persons with other STIs were not notably different between trans and cis women. Clinic access varied by gender: 69% of trans women were enrolled at only one site. Trans women were retained significantly longer: The Kaplan-Meier adjusted median time to discontinuation was 560 and 238 days for trans and cis women, respectively. PIP successfully reached historically marginalized and uninsured cis and trans women who may benefit from PrEP. Further investigations into factors contributing to recruitment and retention of women in HIV prevention programs are needed.

Evaluating Experiences of Stress and Coping Among African American Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic to Inform Future Interventions.

BACKGROUND: African American (AA) women experience disproportionate levels of chronic disease, which is theorized to be driven by greater exposure to acute and chronic stress. The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has further exacerbated existing health disparities among AA communities. Understanding how AA women have experienced and responded to stress during the pandemic may help to inform how future interventions can better address physical and mental well-being in AA communities. AIMS: Drawing from stress and coping models and an ecological framework, the present study conducted a theory-based qualitative assessment of stress-related experiences during the pandemic among a cohort of AA women, including (1) sources of stress, (2) coping strategies, (3) perceptions of health-related behaviors, (4) the role of community, and (5) recommendations for future interventions. METHOD: After completing a group-based physical activity intervention program during the COVID-19 pandemic, a cohort of AA women (N =17, Mage= 49.3 ± 11.24) completed individual interviews. Sessions were conducted by phone, audiotaped, transcribed, and coded by independent raters (rs = .71-.73). Themes were identified using deductive and inductive approaches. RESULTS: Among sources of stress directly related to the pandemic, being at home, getting sick, and homeschooling/parenting were the most frequently discussed themes. Participants engaged in active coping (problem and emotion-focused), with health behaviors, social support, and religion/spirituality, emerging as frequently discussed themes. Although some participants reported passive coping strategies (e.g., avoidance), this approach was less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: These qualitative results are used to guide suggestions for future interventions that jointly address stress and health-related behaviors in order to improve translation of research into practice and policy for future pandemics and disasters.